Atmospheric Methane Research problem statements are shared to build community and knowledge around key challenges to accelerate progress.
Submit a problem statementView all problem statementsC. Michael McGuirk (Colorado School of Mines)
This problem statement was submitted to the first round of the Exploratory Grants for Atmospheric Methane Research funding opportunity, and isn't endorsed, edited, or corrected by Spark.
There is accelerating acknowledgment that methane (CH4) is a key contributor to the anthropogenic greenhouse effect, motivating efforts to both minimize future emissions and reduce what is already in the atmosphere [1]. While progress has been made towards understanding and monitoring methane emissions, effectively no progress has been made for CH4 capture [2].
Unlike CO2 which exists in relatively high atmospheric concentrations (~ 410 ppm), the deleterious effects of CH4 are felt at much lower concentrations (~ 2 ppm) [1]. Further, CH4 is far less reactive as both its geometry and polarity render the C–H bonds inert [3]. Therefore, we are faced with a challenge where atmospheric capture is desired, but CH4 exists at low concentrations and is not intuitively targeted through conventional chemical adsorption mechanisms.
We argue that this lack of progress, particularly in contrast to CO2, is because of a lack of fundamental knowledge necessary to predict and design materials that may selectively adsorb CH4. Specifically, beyond a simple classical dipole argument [4], the scientific community does not have the requisite understanding of what makes the surface of a material interact strongly with competing species (e.g., CO2, H2O, N2 and O2) rather than with CH4. Our goal is to advance the basic science understanding of methane itself by studying the material–methane interface and tailoring it to target methane’s valence molecular orbitals.
Success will be measured by the development of an experimentally corroborated quantitative model correlating adsorbent surface variables, such as composition, structure, and surface potential, to adsorption strength. This model will be disseminated to the community in the form of quantitative “design rules” in high-impact peer-reviewed journals.
To make CH4 capture a reality on the necessary timescales, we must rapidly build a knowledge base using cutting-edge computational and experimental techniques. Without first laying this foundation, the community will continue to spin its wheels attempting to engineer top-down solutions and waste precious time. This proposed work, when successful, will serve as the needed scientific foundation for the targeted design and intuitive study of adsorbents with enhanced selectivity for CH4, and ultimately allow us to determine if physical adsorption is a viable path forward for atmospheric methane capture technologies.
Submitted by
James Farquhar (University of Maryland)
Submitted by
Matteo Cargnello (Stanford University)
Menu
Stay in touch
Sign up to our Spark newsletter and stay updated!
made by
tonik.com